Problems can stem from unacknowledged biases held by me or anyone in the classroom.
inflamatory language, which is based on steryotypes or other offensive remarks.
Prvilieging of some persepctives over others.
Using eExamples that rely on other cultural frames of reference.
Use OUCH
[
I value marignialized perspectives, and seek to integrate such perspectives in the course.
I value everyone's position and seek to include such views and beliefs.
I want to foster sensitivity while listening to student persepctives without tokenization. (For example, one person does not represent a group. We value individuality. Only share what you feel comfortable with,)
Include affirming diversity and inclusiveness.
Be transparent in what we stand for.
[
Use encouraging tone. NOt punative tone.
Avoid Stereotype threat
Treat students as individuals and not members of a specific group
[
- Can you think of a time when you were a student and felt the course climate was especially welcoming? How did that feel? What did the professor do to make it that way?
- Have you ever experienced a course that was in the explicitly marginalizing quadrant? How did that feel? What happened?
- In one of the videos, research was cited that showed how most faculty feel they work within one quadrant, but students experience the course as another quadrant. Can you identify possible changes in your teaching that would help students feel closer to the explicitly centralizing quadrant?
I need to do more of this in online—what I do in person—which is to say my values. The videos are informative for giving me a better language than what I’ve had in my syllabus. Also, I love Muffy’s OUCH approach, as I know giving me the full power to stop students from inappropriate language shouldn’t be just my job—especially if I don’t hear or recognize it when it happens.
No comments:
Post a Comment