Aligning Formative and Summative Assessments
Brainstorming
Summative assessments are formal, high stakes
assessments that evaluate what someone has learned overall in a course. These
are things like term papers, mid-terms, final exams, major projects or
presentations.
Formative assessments are usually less formal, low
stakes assessments that help instructors and students judge where there are
holes in the learning and/or practice skills and knowledge that will need to be
shown in later summative assessments.
1.
Describe one summative assessment that you plan
to assign in your course:
For EN101, a major paper about a selected topic a student is
engaged in.
2.
What are some of the learning outcomes that will
be measured in this assessment?
I use the portfolio rubric to assess SLO criteria for each
assignment, so the research and synthesis is definitely a big measure for this
paper.
3.
In the chart below, brainstorm some possibilities
for formative assessments that you may be able to integrate leading up to the
planned summative assessment?
What is the outcome you want students to learn or do?
|
What is the formative assessment activity?
|
What is the mode and context?
(homework, in class, online?)
|
How will student receive feedback? (self, peer, teacher?)
|
Use and Synthesis of Sources
|
To bring in beginning research for the paper
|
In class looking through for the “best information”
|
Peer groups
|
Reason, Logic, Evidence and
Support
|
Find two or three pieces of grounds
|
In class with one paragraph from paper (scaffolded)
|
A peer finds them, reflects
|
Conventions and Documentation
|
Final paper with steps of looking at MLA or APA formatting
|
In-class series of double-checking (I know it is tedious,
but looking again can help!)
|
Self
|
No comments:
Post a Comment